Alexandria, Louisiana
Five Days at MemorialAlexandria, Louisiana, was the location of a United States Coast Guard emergency command center that became part of the attempted coordination of Memorial Medical Center’s evacuation during Hurricane Katrina. The city enters the account not as the site of the hospital crisis itself, but as an off-site node in the rescue effort—and as the setting for a disputed recollection about whether evacuation by helicopter could continue through the night.
Setting and Operational Role
The command center in Alexandria connected rescue personnel with decisions being made at Memorial. Its role becomes especially clear in accounts of the overnight evacuation: personnel there sought to persuade hospital staff to keep the operation going, while decisions at the hospital’s helipad determined whether that offer would be acted upon. Alexandria’s significance in this episode lies in that separation between the people trying to coordinate continued rescue and those confronting the immediate decision at the hospital.
The book’s account identifies LTJG Shelley Decker and Michael Richard of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary among personnel at the Alexandria command center. It also places Dr. Paul Primeaux there during a call from the United States Coast Guard. These details situate the city within a broader chain of communication, rather than presenting it as a self-contained setting with its own separate storyline.
The Disputed Overnight Message
Primeaux later recalled that he received a call at the command center about continuing the evacuation overnight. Enthusiastic about the possibility, he carried the message to Dr. Richard Deichmann on Memorial’s helipad. According to Primeaux, Deichmann did not think continuing was advisable. The episode makes Alexandria consequential: the command center was not merely tracking events, but was a point from which an offer to extend the rescue effort was conveyed to the hospital.
The recollection is not presented as uncontested. Deichmann did not remember the exchange with Primeaux. In his memoir, however, he described making the same decision later that night. The distinction matters: the account preserves both Primeaux’s memory of bringing the message and Deichmann’s lack of memory of that particular conversation, rather than treating the precise exchange as settled fact. What the sources support is a continuing effort from the command-center side and a decision at the hospital not to proceed overnight.
How Alexandria Enters the Record
The Alexandria episode is reconstructed through later interviews as well as participants’ accounts. Several people who had been at the command center told the author in 2013 that they had tried to persuade Memorial staff to continue the evacuation. Primeaux’s account came from an interview in 2008, while Deichmann’s memoir supplied a separate description of his decision. The different dates and perspectives give the episode a layered documentary history: the location is identifiable, but one key conversation remains disputed.
That uncertainty fits the book’s wider method. The author states that the account draws on hundreds of interviews and on materials created during or soon after the disaster, while acknowledging that memories may diverge. Alexandria therefore carries a significance beyond its physical place in the rescue network: it marks a point where an attempted intervention can be traced, but where the surviving recollections do not align completely.